Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The podsmall.com authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, and this makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, since many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t plan to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.